Your search for Articles on eminent domain, found 109 article(s).
Sponsored Results
| 1 | Delaware Governor Vetoes Bill Restricting Use of Eminent Domain Drew K. Kapur, George J. Kroculick; Duane Morris LLP; July 22, 2008, previously published on July 2, 2008 On June 28, 2008, Gov. Ruth Ann Minner of Delaware vetoed a bill that would have placed tougher restrictions on governmental entities seeking to take private property by eminent domain. |
| 2 | Missouri Supreme Court Grants Shopping Center Owner Right to Sue City for Damages Caused by Threat of Condemnation, But... George J. Kroculick; Duane Morris LLP; July 9, 2008, previously published on June 13, 2008 Property owners in Missouri need not wait until their property is condemned to seek precondemnation damages, at least according to the Missouri Supreme Court. |
| 3 | California Voters Pass Eminent Domain Reform: Impact Limited George J. Kroculick; Duane Morris LLP; June 25, 2008, previously published on June 5, 2008 On June 3, 2008, California voters convincingly approved Proposition 99 and at the same time rejected Proposition 98. |
| 4 | Counsel to Counsel Magazine -- May 2008 Complete Issue April 29, 2008 President's Letter: These are difficult times for many companies, but such times usually call the legal function to the fore. It's clear that the current economic slowdown has put real strain on corporations. The cash crunch has tightened business lending and made restructuring a more... |
| 5 | New Jersey Appellate Court Seeks to Balance Property Owners' Rights and Municipal Redevelopment Efforts Jane Kozinski, Philip Morin III; Saul Ewing LLP; April 22, 2008, previously published on February 2008 In Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRose __ N.J.Super. __ (App. Div. Feb. 25, 2008), the New Jersey Appellate Division held that a property owner that does not challenge a municipality's redevelopment designation within the 45-day time limit set forth in the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law... |
| 6 | Proper Dates of Value in Eminent Domain: The Waters Get Less Muddy -- California Supreme Court Orders RV Communities Depublished John C. Murphy, Emily L. Madueno; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP; April 9, 2008, previously published on March 21, 2008 Thomas Hobbes, the dour 17th Century English philosopher, wrote that "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." Judging by the past few months, the Fourth District of the California Court of Appeal cannot be accused of consistency - much less a foolish one. Within a... |
| 7 | Eminent Domain Legislation Passes
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.; May 21, 2008, previously published on July 2007 Senate Bill 7, relating to eminent domain laws in Ohio, was passed by both the House and the Senate on June 27, 2007 and will take effect 90 days after being signed by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State. The proposed State constitutional amendment restricting eminent domain (SJR1)... |
| 8 | "Underproductive Use" of Property Not Enough to Warrant Redevelopment Henry L. Kent-Smith, Philip J. Morin; Saul Ewing LLP; April 27, 2008, previously published on June 2007 On June 13, 2007, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its decision in Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of Paulsboro (A-51-2006). The Supreme Court reversed the lower court decisions that upheld the Borough of Paulsboro's designation of the subject property as "in need of... |
| 9 | Walking Hand in Hand: Newland Communities and Fowler White Boggs Banker Rhea F. Law; Fowler White Boggs Banker; April 20, 2008, previously published by LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® Counsel to Counsel Magazine on July 2007 From an attorney's perspective, there are real estate projects, and then there are "master-planned communities." Consider San Diego-based Newland Communities' latest project, the 7,000-acre Bexley Ranch. Located in Pasco County, Fla., just outside Tampa, Bexley will feature 6,000... |
| 10 | Appellate Division Affirms Case Awarding Relocation Assistance Timothy P. Duggan; Stark & Stark, A Professional Corporation; February 5, 2008 On January 4, 2007, the Appellate Division affirmed a case which awarded $2 million in relocation assistance for a hot dog manufacturer forced to move its business as a result of a condemnation case. |
